rolex sea dweller 16600 forums 2017 | Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 owners manual rolex sea dweller 16600 forums 2017 Good review. In 2017, I bought a M series 16600 for $6400 that was new old stock from the first owner who bought it new in 2010 and had only worn it for a day or two and then decided it wasn't for him. He put it up and then I got it from him with the full kit including the anchor and hang tags etc.
$5.24
0 · sea dweller 16600 thickness
1 · Rolex Sea-Dweller vs deep
2 · Rolex Sea-Dweller ref 16600
3 · Rolex Sea-Dweller price guide
4 · Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 price
5 · Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 owners manual
6 · Rolex 16600 history
7 · Rolex 16600 dial variants
$71.78
For a Sea-Dweller, the 16600 is by far my favorite sapphire/modern version, but .Good review. In 2017, I bought a M series 16600 for 00 that was new old stock .My Sea Dweller 16600 Rolex General Discussion. Rolex Forums - Rolex . Good review. In 2017, I bought a M series 16600 for 00 that was new old .
For a Sea-Dweller, the 16600 is by far my favorite sapphire/modern version, but I'm more of a classic/vintage Rolex guy. I've tried the newer versions over the last couple of years, including the 40MM SD-C (too top heavy), and the 43mm version (too big/heavy period), and I always go back to the 16600. Good review. In 2017, I bought a M series 16600 for 00 that was new old stock from the first owner who bought it new in 2010 and had only worn it for a day or two and then decided it wasn't for him. He put it up and then I got it from him with the full kit including the anchor and hang tags etc.
It's very strange that there is virtually no price difference between 16610 and 16600. 16610 is definitely a classic but 16600 is much more "exclusive" and rare and I'm sure the production numbers are just a small fraction of the Submariner. I have worn a 5 digit sub (close to your gmt’s size) and a 16600. I LOVED the Sea Dweller. Heres what I found the most striking/different: the thickness is 14.8mm which is around 2mm taller than the subs, gmt, or bb58.
sea dweller 16600 thickness
I just got a 2007 16600 Sea Dweller for all of the reasons you described in your review: smaller lugs, date without cyclops, true "tool" watch. I got a decent deal, which I posted about in this forum. For me the lug-holed 16600 is the most functional “engineering-first” watch Rolex have ever made. It is not designed to be pretty like most of their current watches. It is hardcore functional, at the expense of being less comfortable to wear because of . A forum community dedicated to watch owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about watch collections, displays, watch winders, accessories, classifieds, and more! We welcome all manufacturers including Casio G-Shock, OMEGA, Rolex, Breitling, Rolex and Tudor, Seiko, Grand Seiko and others.
It’s a higher performance Submariner. Love a sub—we all do. That being said, while everyone else is rocking a sub, your SD will grab the eye’s attention ever so subtly more than the sea of subs you may encounter. The SD is like a 6x6 G-wagon compared to the 4x4 G-wagon.
My Sea Dweller 16600 Rolex General Discussion. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion: My Sea Dweller 16600Incoming: 16600 V Serial Sea Dweller, Last of a Legend Rolex General Discussion For a Sea-Dweller, the 16600 is by far my favorite sapphire/modern version, but I'm more of a classic/vintage Rolex guy. I've tried the newer versions over the last couple of years, including the 40MM SD-C (too top heavy), and the 43mm version (too big/heavy period), and I always go back to the 16600. Good review. In 2017, I bought a M series 16600 for 00 that was new old stock from the first owner who bought it new in 2010 and had only worn it for a day or two and then decided it wasn't for him. He put it up and then I got it from him with the full kit including the anchor and hang tags etc.
It's very strange that there is virtually no price difference between 16610 and 16600. 16610 is definitely a classic but 16600 is much more "exclusive" and rare and I'm sure the production numbers are just a small fraction of the Submariner. I have worn a 5 digit sub (close to your gmt’s size) and a 16600. I LOVED the Sea Dweller. Heres what I found the most striking/different: the thickness is 14.8mm which is around 2mm taller than the subs, gmt, or bb58. I just got a 2007 16600 Sea Dweller for all of the reasons you described in your review: smaller lugs, date without cyclops, true "tool" watch. I got a decent deal, which I posted about in this forum.
For me the lug-holed 16600 is the most functional “engineering-first” watch Rolex have ever made. It is not designed to be pretty like most of their current watches. It is hardcore functional, at the expense of being less comfortable to wear because of . A forum community dedicated to watch owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about watch collections, displays, watch winders, accessories, classifieds, and more! We welcome all manufacturers including Casio G-Shock, OMEGA, Rolex, Breitling, Rolex and Tudor, Seiko, Grand Seiko and others. It’s a higher performance Submariner. Love a sub—we all do. That being said, while everyone else is rocking a sub, your SD will grab the eye’s attention ever so subtly more than the sea of subs you may encounter. The SD is like a 6x6 G-wagon compared to the 4x4 G-wagon.
My Sea Dweller 16600 Rolex General Discussion. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion: My Sea Dweller 16600
Rolex Sea-Dweller vs deep
dolce gabbana light blue homme bewertung
Rolex Sea-Dweller ref 16600
$38.50
rolex sea dweller 16600 forums 2017|Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 owners manual
